The Homosexual Agenda

In 1993, F. LaGard Smith wrote a book, Sodom's Second Coming, in which he did an excellent job of exposing the homosexual agenda in this country. Subtitled "What You Need to Know About the Deadly Homosexual Assault", this book should be read by all who are concerned about the organized assault of this immoral group of people.

In view of the reaction  from those in this community to recent comments by Senator Rick Santorum (R-PA), I thought it might be good to share some of the statements regarding this ungodly movement from brother Smith's book.

Hardly anyone stops to notice that gay rights means heterosexuals having to give up rights--like the right to consider character when renting one's house  or when hiring the church secretary; or like the right of parents to keep their children from being taught that homosexual couples are just as acceptable as mommie and daddy. p. 8

Opposing homosexuality is a "hate crime," but labeling people as "homophobics" and "religious bigots" is not? p. 34

When "gay rights" appears on some future ballot initiative, discrimination in housing or hiring will not be the issue. The real issue will be whether we will allow a minority of those who can no longer distinguish "moral" from "immoral" to force the rest of us to give up our own ability to discriminate between right and wrong whenever we encounter that choice being flaunted in our faces. pp. 36-37

To gays it must be said: If it's privacy you want, then keep it private! We weren't the ones who insisted that you come out of the closet!

The best way to keep the public out of one's business is to keep from telling the whole world what you do. By their actions, gays show that they don't have a clue what "live and let live" really means. If they don't want people to throw stones at glass houses, then they ought to have the decency to draw the curtains. The public nature of the gay movement is itself the strongest possible evidence that the great "right of privacy" issue has almost nothing to do with privacy and virtually everything to do with the free, open, and unrestricted exercise of immorality. p. 174

The single most disturbing aspect of the battle over gay rights is the deliberate curtailment of the free exercise of religion in America.

...gay rights always requires those who find homosexual behavior to be morally reprehensible to make some action on behalf of gays. At a minimum (as is also true of abortion), it means requiring society to forgo its inherent right to define its collective moral character. As we have seen, society not only has the right but the responsibility to impose a collective sense of morality

...giving gay rights invariably means taking away religious rights. Make no mistake about it: "Gay rights" means the elevation of the right to have immoral homosexual relations over the right to act pursuant to one's religious conscience. Inevitably, it prioritizes immorality over immorality.

Of this you can be sure: To whatever extent gay rights are given free rein in government edicts, freedom of religion is sure to be restricted. pp. 181-182